Labels:book | reckoner | sky OCR: competition claim is based on different and facts thar its clai against Windmere. The fact that jury that Windmere was nOt guilty of unfair competition has very little bearing on the validity Philips claim against Sears. Therefore the public interest in the finality of judgment of patent invalidity which precludes the assertion of invalid patent. simply not implicated here Thus, Izumi has TO interest in preserving these judgments that overrides the interests at the parties, and the court properly exercised its discretion 11 vacating them The result below also constituted sound exercise of discretion hi promoting justice and faimess the parties. The court appeals decision permitted Windmere C accept what believed to rea asonable settlement and prevented Philips from forever bearing the coll ...
(.png)
